Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Israel did not attack Hamas, it responded

What if you didn't know anybetter, what if all you did was read and believe everything you read by the elite media? Surely you would beleive that government programs solve all the problems that ail society, that "high" taxes are good, and that Israel is attacking the Palestinians and killing innocent people for selfish gain.

Ah, if only everyone was privy to all the facts. Yet it does seem that liberals around the world refuse to believe in facts. For, if they listened to the facts, they would know that the Palestinians were shooting missiles into Israel long before Israel decided to retaliate and stop the terrorizers who happen to live in the Gaza strip (land the Israeli's gave the Palestinians in the hope that this act would lead to peace).

So, perhaps you believe liberals and believe the media that Israel attacked Hamas. Why? Why would Israel attack Hamas in the Gaza strip? What would Israel have to gain from this. I think Rush Limbaugh said it best:

"A question for you in the Drive-By Media: Why do you think Israel would attack Gaza? Is it for their national treasure? Is it because Israel wants all of the scientific discoveries that are being made by Hamas intellectuals? Is it because Israel wants that sand pit of territory? Israel was more than happy to give it away, so why the hell attack? What's there that you want? You want the oil deposits? There aren't any. Do you want the golf courses? There aren't any. Do you want the major economic infrastructure? There isn't any. Do you want the sanitation plants? There isn't any. Why attack? The Israelis left Gaza years ago. They gave Gaza to the Gazantas; they gave Gaza to the Hamas; they gave Gaza to the Palestinians. Why do you think Israel attacked Gaza? God gave you a mind. The fact is they didn't attack Gaza. Israel is finally defending itself."I

It's easy to believe everything you read. It's easy to believe everything the media throws out because the people doing the writing have the time to investigate, and most of us readers lead busy lives and don't have time to investigate everything the media throws out at us.

And, hence, that is exactly why liberalism is so popular these days. When you tell a lie enough times, people start to believe it.

But, be it as it may, the media continues to call for peace in the Middle East. However, the only way there will ever be peace in the Middle East is if Israel is allowed to fight, and Israel wins. Like Iraq, there will be no peace until there is victory.

Worded best by Rush:
"That is what is common sense. That is what is world history. Peace is not the result of doctors, nurses, words, clean water, toothbrushes, Habitat for Humanity building rickety houses that collapse in ten years. Peace is the result of victory: one side winning and one side losing. As long as these ceasefires keep happening before the termination and culmination of events, this process will continue."

And it's not Rush Limbaugh who is the wacky one here. Rush is saying what most Americans think yet you hear no where on national television except for Conservative talk radio and maybe Fox News and the occasional talk show on CNN such as Lou Dobbs.

1 comment:

Khaki Elephant said...

The bottom line is that if Hamas wouldn't shoot at Isreal then Isreal wouldn't have to shoot back.