Creating a New World Order: Part V

The movement to create a New World Order did not end with the failure of the League of Nations. It was merely slowed down. The movement did not end with the death of FDR. Again, it was merely slowed by yet another obstacle.

Likewise the American people did not stop the movement, the progressives just had to regroup and slowly inculcate their values into the minds of Americans. This was all part of the plan. It was made easier when liberalism took over the media, the school system, and eventually even Hollywood.

Baby steps.

Likewise, God didn't stop the revolution either. And to take care of this problem, progressives have slowly gotten rid of God in schools, and even succeeded at making sure most American children are taught in liberal run schools, where somehow they managed to get rid of prayer and an education revolved around Jesus -- even if that's what one particular school wanted.

Baby steps. The seeds were slowly planted, and slowly the tree grew and flourished. As time went by, progerssives managed to get a progressive income tax that (1913) that made it constitutional to treat some Americans different than others, whereby you are taxed not equally, but based on your income.

Baby steps. They ultimately made a law making it legal to tax the working class to force them to prepare for retirement. This was a noble idea, yet the government social security program still to this day is not the way FDR planned it. His original idea was for it to be self supporting.

Yet to get it passed Congress had to change it with the stipulation it would be fixed later. Does this sound familiar. The Obama Healthcare package passed with the stipulation that it would be fixed later. Social Security was never fixed, and when George W. Bush tried to fix it, progressives cried foul.

All of the above I mentioned are unconstitutional. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say the Federal Goverment can make laws regulating schools, retirement, or health care.

Yet that doesn't matter to progressives. They managed to get their programs passed.

Baby steps. The seeds have been planted, and they are now flourishing as a blossoming tree. Over the next 40-60 years after the death of FDR government taxes and spending increased. Nixon added welfare, forcing the rich to help the poor. Yes this is a noble idea, yet capitalism would give poeple the freedom to spend their money as they wish.

And, under Ronald Reagan, when taxes were at their lowest since the days of FDR, charitable givings were at record highs. Yet taxes would go up under George H.W. Bush and again under Clinton, and with it charitable givings down. The progressives would take money from people and decide how best to spend it.

Baby steps. GWB would increase government spending even more by adding a prescription drug program. Yes a noble cause, but every time you take another dollar from a person that's another dollar that could be spent on something else. That's another job that is not created.

GWB also helped to add to the progressive problem by never vetoing a spending bill, and never stopping the progressive plan to force banks to give loans to people who otherwise never would have been approved for a house loan. This lead to the housing bubble, and the ultimate housing bubble collapse that lead to the recession of 2008.

Yet it was all part of the plan. No, GWB wasn't in on the plan, yet he stood by and let it happen. he never did a thing to stop it. He, like Hoover and GWHB, kind of got suckered into progressivism by the political process: they believed if they gave into progressivism they'd get more votes. That's how the establishment works.

Bill Clinton had a republican Congress, so he kind of got suckered into signing a bill to cut certain taxes. And it was this that prevented the economy from collapsing when he raised income taxes. Yet his taxes did ultimately lead to a recession he blamed on the republican Congress, yet GWHB was "selected" as the next president thwarting the plan.

Then Obama was elected. He was brave and, like Carter before him, ran not as a conservative to get elected, but as a full blown liberal/progressive. His goal would be to collapse the U.S. dollar by loaning money that was borrowed from China to foreign, impoverished nations.

Recently Hilary Clinton proposed loaning environmentally friendly carbon emission free stoves to African poor nations. Why would she propose this when the cost is $50 billion that we cannot affort to spend in a recession? And we would have to borrow to loan?

At same time Obama plans to increase taxes on the rich by letting the Bush tax cuts expire. He tells us he will not allow a tax hike on the middle class, but that's exactly what would happen when the Bush tax cuts expire. As we learn in economics 101, it's bad to raise taxes during a recession. It's dumb.

So far Obama has increased the national debt in less than 2 years more than all the presidents in the 250 years of this nations existence before him. And all this tax and spending, redistribution of wealth, is about to collapse our economy. There is no way we can sustain this.

Yet it's all part of the plan. It's all by design. The U.S. dollar has already dropped by 20% since 1980. By making U.S. economy unstable, by increasing taxes, by creating an unstable market, the U.S. is set for a collapse. No way we can continue what we are doing and continue to be a viable nation.

As of today 51% of Americans are on the government dole, and only 48% pay taxes. The top 15% already pay 85% of all the taxes. And with fewer and fewer paying taxes, and government growing, the burden of this debt is falling on fewer and fewer Americans. It's unsustainable.

And Obama, in order to create his more perfect union, has proposed a third stimulus package. The first one was all pork spending on projects that were not needed, as evidence by the fact they were never paid for by local governments or states. Yet Obama decided to pay for them.

It was all part of the plan. It's not really a stimulus, but that's what he calls it to sell it. It's an attempt to buy votes. It's an attempt to make the people think he's doing something. Yet doing something isn't always the best solution in a recession, as Grover Cleveland once said during one of his recessions.

The stimulus is really pork to raise the national debt adn crate more instability in the market.

Yet once again the people have caught on. The American people are smart. They know all these government programs create unstability. They know you can't raise taxes on the people who are supposed to create jobs, especially in a recession. They even figured out the Bush Stimulus, and the Obama stimulus, never stimulated anything, and do not want a 3rd.

They are tired of paying for it. They are tired of the burden being placed on their kids to pay for the progressive debt. And Obama's polling is now down to the low 40s as Bush W. was before him before his term ended. Obama's polling is closing in on 35%, where both GWB and Jimmy Carter were before him due to progressive failures. Due to the plan.

Yet an obstacle does not stop the plan. If Obama is not re-elected, progressives will continue on trying to grow the already flourishing tree that grew from little seedlings. Baby steps.

Or will the American people finally wake up. Will they finally see the attack on the Constitution? Is that what the Tea Party is all about? Only history will show us.