Friday, December 11, 2009

New World Order will mandate what we eat and how many children we have

Reading some of the reports coming out Copenhagen tonight is enough to send a cold shiver up any free thinking person's spine. Not only is the aim to end global warming, but it's to change the way we live and think.

A reporter for the Guardian writes that one of the main ways of controlling climate change and force people to be health is to mandate a diet of less meat. The report notes:

"The first official recommendations for a diet that is both healthy and good for the environment are published today, and they are likely to be seen as an assault on the UK's current food system.

"To fight climate change and tackle the growing crisis of diet-related diseases such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer, British consumers must cut down on meat and dairy produce, reduce their intake of processed foods and curb waste."

Of course such a policy would have devastating consequences not just on our God given right to choose what we eat, but on the economy. One study noted that "cutting processed food and reducing consumption of intensively-produced meat and dairy foods could lead to a shrinking of the UK food and drink industry."

If you consider the food and drink industry is 7% of Britain's GDP, this could be huge. And if it were a worldwide mandate, huge wouldn't even begin to describe it.

One report out of Copenhagen notes a hidden agenda that would take away the sovereign rights of the United States and Create a Global Economy. Then they want to name Obama as the world president. I believe I wrote about how this was a quest of Obama's in this post.

The funny thing is, many democrats (including some I work with) support this. One of my liberal friends said, "It's time another country had a chance to be the leader of the world."

In Copenhagen, China recommending that the entire world adapt it's one child per family policy. A leader of the communist government said, "Dealing with climate change is not simply an issue of CO2 emission reduction but a comprehensive challenge involving political, economic, social, cultural and ecological issues, and the population concern fits right into the picture"

Likewise, the article notes: "Although China's family planning policy has received criticism over the past three decades, Zhao said that China's population program has made a great historic contribution to the well-being of society."

Right there: a shiver went up my spine and it should yours too.

Another report from one of Canada's premier newspapers (click here), reports that China's policy ought to be adapted by the rest of the world too.

The author notes:

"A planetary law, such as China's one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.

"The world's other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity's soaring reproduction rate.

"Ironically, China, despite its dirty coal plants, is the world's leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict."
Eerily, she also notes:

"Humans are the only rational animals but have yet to prove it. Medical and other scientific advances have benefited by delivering lower infant mortality rates as well as longevity. Both are welcome, but humankind has not yet re calibrated its behavior to account for the fact that the world can only accommodate so many people, especially if billions get indoor plumbing and cars.

"The fix is simple. It's dramatic. And yet the world's leaders don't even have this on their agenda in Copenhagen.

So basically she believes man is destroying the earth, and the only solution is to not allow men to be born. Basically, she believes this poppycock theory, and wants the "New World Order" to force it on the rest of us.

This is the kind of stuff that scares the bejeezers out of me, and it should you too.

No comments: