Here's a question posed to me at work yesterday: Why is it that the rich have to pay for government programs that don't even benefit them? Where in the Constitution does it say that some of us have to take on a greater burden of the government debt?
Or, worded a better way, why is it that the rich have to pay a greater share of wasteful government programs? What did the rich do to be forced to pay for out of control government spending?
All the evidence shows that people in the upper middle class and the rich create 75% of the jobs in this country. They are the same who keep the economy rolling (when it is rolling) by investing in new equipment and expanding their businesses and creating new jobs. Yet we have certain people in Washington who force them to pay for bad debt they did not create.
The rich people who own and mange businesses do what needs to be done to keep their businesses afloat. They move their businesses to areas of lower taxes, such as what happened to many industries in Michigan. Taxes and regulations are so high here that business leaders decided to go across the boarder to Indiana or Ohio.
Likewise, some businesses are sending jobs overseas because the cost of running shop in other countries is less than, say, in Michigan. That's what Rick Snyder did to keep his business alive. Democrats criticize him for sending jobs overseas. Yet others hail him for doing what was necessary to keep his business open.
There's this old saying that government does not create wealth, all it does is destroy it. And by taxing the rich and creating programs that make more people dependent on the government is a perfect example of destroying wealth.
If you tax the rich, or threaten to tax them more (which is what is happening with the Bush tax cuts) all this results in is ticking off the job creators. And that is exactly why this recession we are in is not going to go away until those running Washington get with the program and realize what I'm writing about in this post.
Those in Washington should not be discussing who should get tax cuts and who should not (and usually it's the rich they say should not). The Constitution does not say we can take away the freedoms of some and not others. And when we take money from the people and decide how that money is going to be spent instead of the person who earned it, this is taking away freedom.
And it used to be that we would die before we gave up our freedom, or the freedom of others. Now we intentionally take it. That's what it's come down to now here in the U.S.
Where is the economic theory that proclaims that the best way to improve an economy is to punish those who achieve and who create jobs and create opportunities for wages to increase? Where is that theory? Is it Keynesian economics? Is that the theory?
Well, progressives like Obama and FDR follow Keynesian economics. So it's progressives who have created their own theory to improve the economy, yet it doesn't improve the economy: it destroys the economy.
And why would they do that? Why would a President of the U.S. intentionally destroy the economy and lie to us and say he is trying to fix it? Hmmmm. Perhaps he wants to destroy it so he can come to us and say: I have the solution, and it's called a New World Order.
Showing posts with label new world order. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new world order. Show all posts
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Is Obama pent to destroy America?
Here's a good quote by Rush Limbaugh from his program on Thursday November 4, 2010, about Obama's vision for the future of America. This is a perfect example of why Rush sticks by his quote: "I hope he fails."
"Now, who made Barack Obama or Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid or any Democrat, I don't care, any Democrat, who made them the decider on what anybody should make and then what level of taxation they should pay? Who made them the deciders on what we should eat? Who made them the decider of what kind of lightbulbs we have in our homes? Who made them the deciders on the kind of car we should drive? Who made them the deciders on what kinda house we live in? Who made them the deciders of when and where we can and can't turn our lights on? Who made them the deciders of who loses how much of their freedom? Who gave them that power? It doesn't come from the Constitution. The Constitution does not say the Democrat Party gets to decide which car people drive, which lightbulb they have, what foods they can and can't eat, and what lights they can't turn off or on at what time of year. The Constitution does not say that the Democrat Party gets to decide any of this.
The Constitution does not envision this kind of usurpation of freedom. The Constitution does not envision nor allow for this kind of invasion of private property rights or overall liberty or freedom. It has to have been a political party looking at the Constitution and being unhappy with what it says, ignoring it in order to implement their policy.
How did this happen? It happens because people for whatever reason are willing to sacrifice, and maybe not even know it's happening, little bits of their freedom and liberty now and then, under the auspices of it's a good cause, or it's in the name of compassion, fairness. Well, I want somebody to tell me what is fair about one incompetent having the right to systematically destroy my country. I want to know where the fairness is in that. I want to know why in hell anybody is even thinking about much less talking about compromising with this man. I want to know why anybody who believes in the Constitution wants to discuss compromising individual freedom or liberty with this man. Because that's what the compromise is. When people say that we must compromise with Obama, we are saying we must compromise on our freedom.
Let me tell you something, President Obama. You can reject it all you want. But you've done it. And we know you're happyyou've done it. You might want people to think you're not happy about the direction the country is going, but if you really were unhappy about it you'd do something to stop it. Instead, you're doubling down on it. You reject the idea your policies have taken the country in reverse? Where the hell have your policies taken us? You happily preside over a nation in decline. You have told the world no longer will the US population lead the world economy. Ain't gonna happen anymore.
If we want to keep our country the way it is,then we ought to hope Obama fails too.
Thursday, May 12, 2011
The official rules under the New World Order
I have written on this blog before that the intent of progressives in the U.S. is to collapse the U.S. system so that the U.S. will have no choice but to submit to the UN, and at this time a New World
Order (NWO) will have been created. So once we have a NWO, what will be be submitting to?
The following is what will happen once the NWO is created:
1. Churches will be destroyed. The Bible preaches individualism and personal accountability and therefore capitalism. It cannot be allowed for people to worship such folly, and therefore it must be stopped. As Stalin said, socialism and religion cannot exist in the same world. The only religion allowed will be the state religion (worship the state) and that of nature.
2. The U.S. Constitution will be null and void, and the U.S. will be subject to all laws created by the old UN which will now be called the New World Order. The U.S. will be subject to all laws, codes, and rulings made by conventions held in Geneva.
3. The NWO will take over all industries in the world, and will set regulations for all these industries to follow. Violators will be severely punished by the world court.
4. Parents will not be allowed to spank their children. Violators will be subject to a minimum of 6 month prison sentence and two years of parental counseling for first offence. Second offense is 1 year prison term and four years of counseling. Third offense will result in a 10% (additional) reduction in income, lifetime counseling, and all children will be taken by the government and put in child concentration camps until they are 18 years of age.
5. Alcohol will be outlawed. Anyone found with an ETOH level of higher than 0.1 will be subject to no less than one year in jail and habit counseling. We prefer the level to be zero, however some medicines have ethanol in them. If you take a medicine with a higher ethanol level you must obtain permission from the world court.
6. All money will be taxed at 100% and each person will get an equal share, and just enough to live on. The rest of the money will be equally distributed to run the NWO, run the world court, correct wrongs in the world, and prosecute those who speak out against the NWO and it's rulers.
7. The Internet will be shut down except for NWO approved sites. You will still have freedom of speech except you will not be allowed to speak of such frivolous things as capitalism, the Bible, American values, individual rights, rights of men, etc.
8. Conservative talk radio will be off the air.
9. Book publishing will be subject to NWO codes than ensure authors follow the codes of #7 above.
10. All children will be forced to go to government run schools, and the agenda must be supported by the NWO School Code which does not allow school prayer, Bibles, or the mentioning of anything related to capitalism (conservatism) or the Bible. Violators will be severely prosecuted.
11. There will be no more capital punishment. Those convicted of murder or rape will get life sentences of a free room, food, cable TV, and a lifetime counselor.
12. Fox News Channel and all its lies will be abolished and banned forever.
13. All gasoline vehicles will be banned. All vehicles will have GPS systems.
14. All newborns must have a chip so the NWO can know of their health and whereabouts at all times. All current peoples will have a chip inserted by a specified date. All violators found without a chip as of said date will be immediately killed.
15. Anyone exceeding their recommended ideal body weight will have their income taxed an additional 10% for every 10% increase in ideal body weight.
16. In order to curb CO2 emissions, meat products will be rationed, and no more than one meat product will be consumed in any given day.
17. Anyone violating rape, child molestation, and other crimes against humanity will be subject to social rehabilitation. Second offense will result in the minimal penalty of jail and a fine of no more than 10% of income rationing. Third offense will result in a life sentence.
18. Animals will be subject to the same rights as men, and animal cruelty and death caused by man will be subject to imprisonment and even death in accordance with NWO animal CODE.
19. The UN Security Council will be responsible for all war codes, and for maintaining peace between disagreeing nations.
20. All nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction will be banned. Any nation or rogue individuals found with WOMD will be punished by a 20% deduction from the income ration provided by the NWO. For other crimes against the NWO code, any subsequent deductions will be deducted after this 20% is deducted. This punishment will be in full effect for ten years following the crime.
21. All pregnancies must be immediately reported to local health officials. All unborn children will be subject to genetic testing, and any child who has the potential to not be a normal, viable person will be terminated.
22. All life forms that are not productive members of society, and are otherwise burdens to society, will be subject to a usefulness trial within 365 days. If usefulness is therefore re-established, a similar trial will be held no less than every 365 days. If such a trial determines a life-form to be a detriment or burden on society, the life will be therefore terminated by lethal injection.
23. Children will attend school until the age of 25. In order to obtain fairness, all children will be moved from one grade to another at the beginning of each school year, and grades will not be doled out in order to prevent underprivileged kids from feeling bad. In sporting events, score will not be kept in order not to subject children from the feeling of loss and suffering.
24. Starting at the age of 70 all humans will be subject to a trial to determine their usefulness to society no less than every 365 days. Otherwise, see code #22 above.
25. Cigarette smoking will be banned. Anyone found with a Carboxyhemoglobin higher than 2 will be jailed and subject to habit counseling for no less than one year.
26. The Amerigo will be the NWO paper money system.
27. Only members of the Civil Army will be allowed to have weapons. Anyone found with a weapon will be subject to no less than one year in jail and peace counseling.
28. All previous Constitution, especially the U.S. Constitution, will be null and void and all people and nations f the world will be subject to the Codes of Conduct as written by the New World Order, the Court of Justice, The Criminal Court and the National Security Council.
29. To further curb carbon emissions and to make sure people are eating a healthy diet, all food will be regulated and rashioned as per the recommendations of the World Food and Health Council (WFHC).
30. All women will be limited to no more than two children at one time. Mandatory sterilization must be implemented on all humans who have had their second child within 30 days of the birth of the 2nd child, if the child is viable (see code 21 above). If a child is found to be a burden on society and is thus terminated (see 22 above), the artificial artification process may be an option for these families. However, all sperm and eggs obtainef for this project will be subject to the genetic testing process as determined by the WTHC.
31. Unless otherwise approved by the World Works Commission (WWS), all lights must be turned off by 11 p.m to conserve energy. Heating devices and air conditioners will be allowed, but the temperature must be set at no higher than 60 during the winter months and no less than 70 in the summer months. Heating and cooling devices will be monitored by The Criminal Court.
32. Television, radio, print media, and the Internet will be monitored by the World Trade Commission (WTC) and subject to equal rights programming. All programming will also have to be approved for content by the WTC.
33. No one shall drive any vehicle until they are older than 18 years of age. Likewise, after the age of 60 each person's driving skills, visual and response skills are still up to par.
34.
Order (NWO) will have been created. So once we have a NWO, what will be be submitting to?
The following is what will happen once the NWO is created:
1. Churches will be destroyed. The Bible preaches individualism and personal accountability and therefore capitalism. It cannot be allowed for people to worship such folly, and therefore it must be stopped. As Stalin said, socialism and religion cannot exist in the same world. The only religion allowed will be the state religion (worship the state) and that of nature.
2. The U.S. Constitution will be null and void, and the U.S. will be subject to all laws created by the old UN which will now be called the New World Order. The U.S. will be subject to all laws, codes, and rulings made by conventions held in Geneva.
3. The NWO will take over all industries in the world, and will set regulations for all these industries to follow. Violators will be severely punished by the world court.
4. Parents will not be allowed to spank their children. Violators will be subject to a minimum of 6 month prison sentence and two years of parental counseling for first offence. Second offense is 1 year prison term and four years of counseling. Third offense will result in a 10% (additional) reduction in income, lifetime counseling, and all children will be taken by the government and put in child concentration camps until they are 18 years of age.
5. Alcohol will be outlawed. Anyone found with an ETOH level of higher than 0.1 will be subject to no less than one year in jail and habit counseling. We prefer the level to be zero, however some medicines have ethanol in them. If you take a medicine with a higher ethanol level you must obtain permission from the world court.
6. All money will be taxed at 100% and each person will get an equal share, and just enough to live on. The rest of the money will be equally distributed to run the NWO, run the world court, correct wrongs in the world, and prosecute those who speak out against the NWO and it's rulers.
7. The Internet will be shut down except for NWO approved sites. You will still have freedom of speech except you will not be allowed to speak of such frivolous things as capitalism, the Bible, American values, individual rights, rights of men, etc.
8. Conservative talk radio will be off the air.
9. Book publishing will be subject to NWO codes than ensure authors follow the codes of #7 above.
10. All children will be forced to go to government run schools, and the agenda must be supported by the NWO School Code which does not allow school prayer, Bibles, or the mentioning of anything related to capitalism (conservatism) or the Bible. Violators will be severely prosecuted.
11. There will be no more capital punishment. Those convicted of murder or rape will get life sentences of a free room, food, cable TV, and a lifetime counselor.
12. Fox News Channel and all its lies will be abolished and banned forever.
13. All gasoline vehicles will be banned. All vehicles will have GPS systems.
14. All newborns must have a chip so the NWO can know of their health and whereabouts at all times. All current peoples will have a chip inserted by a specified date. All violators found without a chip as of said date will be immediately killed.
15. Anyone exceeding their recommended ideal body weight will have their income taxed an additional 10% for every 10% increase in ideal body weight.
16. In order to curb CO2 emissions, meat products will be rationed, and no more than one meat product will be consumed in any given day.
17. Anyone violating rape, child molestation, and other crimes against humanity will be subject to social rehabilitation. Second offense will result in the minimal penalty of jail and a fine of no more than 10% of income rationing. Third offense will result in a life sentence.
18. Animals will be subject to the same rights as men, and animal cruelty and death caused by man will be subject to imprisonment and even death in accordance with NWO animal CODE.
19. The UN Security Council will be responsible for all war codes, and for maintaining peace between disagreeing nations.
20. All nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction will be banned. Any nation or rogue individuals found with WOMD will be punished by a 20% deduction from the income ration provided by the NWO. For other crimes against the NWO code, any subsequent deductions will be deducted after this 20% is deducted. This punishment will be in full effect for ten years following the crime.
21. All pregnancies must be immediately reported to local health officials. All unborn children will be subject to genetic testing, and any child who has the potential to not be a normal, viable person will be terminated.
22. All life forms that are not productive members of society, and are otherwise burdens to society, will be subject to a usefulness trial within 365 days. If usefulness is therefore re-established, a similar trial will be held no less than every 365 days. If such a trial determines a life-form to be a detriment or burden on society, the life will be therefore terminated by lethal injection.
23. Children will attend school until the age of 25. In order to obtain fairness, all children will be moved from one grade to another at the beginning of each school year, and grades will not be doled out in order to prevent underprivileged kids from feeling bad. In sporting events, score will not be kept in order not to subject children from the feeling of loss and suffering.
24. Starting at the age of 70 all humans will be subject to a trial to determine their usefulness to society no less than every 365 days. Otherwise, see code #22 above.
25. Cigarette smoking will be banned. Anyone found with a Carboxyhemoglobin higher than 2 will be jailed and subject to habit counseling for no less than one year.
26. The Amerigo will be the NWO paper money system.
27. Only members of the Civil Army will be allowed to have weapons. Anyone found with a weapon will be subject to no less than one year in jail and peace counseling.
28. All previous Constitution, especially the U.S. Constitution, will be null and void and all people and nations f the world will be subject to the Codes of Conduct as written by the New World Order, the Court of Justice, The Criminal Court and the National Security Council.
29. To further curb carbon emissions and to make sure people are eating a healthy diet, all food will be regulated and rashioned as per the recommendations of the World Food and Health Council (WFHC).
30. All women will be limited to no more than two children at one time. Mandatory sterilization must be implemented on all humans who have had their second child within 30 days of the birth of the 2nd child, if the child is viable (see code 21 above). If a child is found to be a burden on society and is thus terminated (see 22 above), the artificial artification process may be an option for these families. However, all sperm and eggs obtainef for this project will be subject to the genetic testing process as determined by the WTHC.
31. Unless otherwise approved by the World Works Commission (WWS), all lights must be turned off by 11 p.m to conserve energy. Heating devices and air conditioners will be allowed, but the temperature must be set at no higher than 60 during the winter months and no less than 70 in the summer months. Heating and cooling devices will be monitored by The Criminal Court.
32. Television, radio, print media, and the Internet will be monitored by the World Trade Commission (WTC) and subject to equal rights programming. All programming will also have to be approved for content by the WTC.
33. No one shall drive any vehicle until they are older than 18 years of age. Likewise, after the age of 60 each person's driving skills, visual and response skills are still up to par.
34.
Monday, February 28, 2011
How to stop progressives
Creating a New World Order: Part IX
The only way to stop progressives is with God and returning to the founders vision for America.
We must cut taxes. We must decrease spending by a lot, which will mean upsetting some voters by cutting government programs. We must cut government jobs. We must stop paying government workers twice what average workers make. We must stop giving government workers benefits better that what the free market provides.
We must reform social security. We must reform welfare. We must repeal Obamacare. We need to put forth real health care reforms such as making it harder to sue doctors, and allowing people to purchase healthcare from any company in any state.
We must bring God back into the nation. God teaches capitalism.
We must educate our kids about the founding fathers, and the founding documents, and about the true meaning of the First Thanksgiving. We must teach that capitalism has succeeded wherever it has been tried, and that progressivism and redistribution of wealth has failed every time it has been tried.
We must stop changing history. We must tell history accurately. We must teach our kids the true version of history, even if we don't like it -- so as we do not continue to repeat the mistakes of the past.
We must stop making laws that are unconstitutional. We must preserve and protect the 10th amendment which was made to protect the sovereignty of the states and of the people. We must stop making laws that take away personal freedoms and give more power to the federal government.
We must stop taking power away from people like you and me.
And the only way to do this is for conservatives -- God fearing capitalists and normal people like you and me -- to get control of Washington and to gain a majority.
No. We must not just elect republicans. We must elect conservative republicans. We need a conservative majority, not just a republican majority. Sixty seats in the House, and 51 seats in the Senate.
And then we must win the office of the President in 2012 while maintaining our majority.
God. The Founders. The Constitution
The only way to stop progressives is with God and returning to the founders vision for America.
We must cut taxes. We must decrease spending by a lot, which will mean upsetting some voters by cutting government programs. We must cut government jobs. We must stop paying government workers twice what average workers make. We must stop giving government workers benefits better that what the free market provides.
We must reform social security. We must reform welfare. We must repeal Obamacare. We need to put forth real health care reforms such as making it harder to sue doctors, and allowing people to purchase healthcare from any company in any state.
We must bring God back into the nation. God teaches capitalism.
We must educate our kids about the founding fathers, and the founding documents, and about the true meaning of the First Thanksgiving. We must teach that capitalism has succeeded wherever it has been tried, and that progressivism and redistribution of wealth has failed every time it has been tried.
We must stop changing history. We must tell history accurately. We must teach our kids the true version of history, even if we don't like it -- so as we do not continue to repeat the mistakes of the past.
We must stop making laws that are unconstitutional. We must preserve and protect the 10th amendment which was made to protect the sovereignty of the states and of the people. We must stop making laws that take away personal freedoms and give more power to the federal government.
We must stop taking power away from people like you and me.
And the only way to do this is for conservatives -- God fearing capitalists and normal people like you and me -- to get control of Washington and to gain a majority.
No. We must not just elect republicans. We must elect conservative republicans. We need a conservative majority, not just a republican majority. Sixty seats in the House, and 51 seats in the Senate.
And then we must win the office of the President in 2012 while maintaining our majority.
God. The Founders. The Constitution
Friday, February 25, 2011
NWO part VIII: The NWO versus soveirinity
To get a majority of the colonies to approve of the U.S. Constitution state soveirinity had to be protected. I think it is this Federalism that has allowed the U.S. to have the longest lasting Constitution in the history of the world.
The Constitution only gives the Federal government the right to make laws in seven areas. The 10th Amendment aptly states that anything not mentioned in the Constitution is left to the people to decide.
This was key to passing the Constitution, because it protected state rights. It allowed each state to be run as a small country without having to worry about the Federal government absconding power from them.
In this way, one state could have a Catholic run school and another an athiest school or a Muslim school or a school where all religions could mingle. And let it be known that at the time the Constitution was passed there were at least six states that had religious run schools.
This also adjusts for the unique cultures and backgrounds of the various states. In this way, the states could experiment. One state, like Massachusettes, can experiment with universal healthcare. If it works it might be adapted by other states. If not, if will not be adapted by other states.
In this way, I don't think it's a good idea to compare what works in one state with the entire United States. If, for example, the U.S. Constitution were changed as progressives want to do, and healthcare were made universal, or education was publicly run by the government (kind of like it is now), chaos will ensue. It will ensue because some states may not have a history or values that accept that.
As you can see, with abortion, when the Federal government forces something on all the people, even if it's for their own good, chaos ensues. Hence, we have the partisan divide.
It is for this reason that I think a New World Order would never work. There is no way that on governing body can decide what is best for the rest of the world, because each country, each que state, has uniqe values and a unique history and culture.
What works for Spain will not necessarily work for, say, Texas. What works in Britain or Canada will not necessarily work for the United States. What works in Britain might work in Texas, but not the U.S. as a whole.
I word it this way because some countries, like Britain and Canada, are the size of a state. Universal Healthcare might work great in a country like Canada with it's 24 million people. Yet try the same system in the U.S. which has 300 million plus citizens and 50 unique little countries that we call states, and chaos will ensue.
Now a facesious example. Say 80% of the people in Britain believe kids shouldn't be spanked. Now say in Michigan 20% say kids should not be spanked. So if this NWO decided to force a ban on spanking kids on the entire world, the people of Michigan would refuse to follow this law. I know I would. I know other people where I live would refuse too, as we are a relatively Christian and conservative region.
There is no way I would allow someone in Copenhagan to tell me they know more about raising kids than I do. I'm not saying I'm an expert, yet it's this freedom of choice in how to discipline my kids that makes mem happy. It's called freedom. It's called soveirinity.
There is not way you can tell me that a world order would do a better job of protecting my freedoms than my own Constitution already does. It is for this reason both Bill Clinton (a liberal) and Georgy Bush (a republican) refused to sign up for the world court. Both didn't want a world court to supercede the U.S. Constitution, which better protects our freedoms than the world court would.
I know that this New World Order would work the way I say above because the people who want this to happen are progressives. And progressives believe experts -- progressives experts preferably -- should decide what is good for everyone.
Besides, if a corporation over spends and crashes, it can file for bankruptcy. If a state mismanages itself, the country can bail it out. If a country crashes, the U.N. can bail it out. Yet what then happens if the NWO spends itself into failure. Rome would happen. A dark age would ensue. Chaos would be the result.
The Constitution only gives the Federal government the right to make laws in seven areas. The 10th Amendment aptly states that anything not mentioned in the Constitution is left to the people to decide.
This was key to passing the Constitution, because it protected state rights. It allowed each state to be run as a small country without having to worry about the Federal government absconding power from them.
In this way, one state could have a Catholic run school and another an athiest school or a Muslim school or a school where all religions could mingle. And let it be known that at the time the Constitution was passed there were at least six states that had religious run schools.
This also adjusts for the unique cultures and backgrounds of the various states. In this way, the states could experiment. One state, like Massachusettes, can experiment with universal healthcare. If it works it might be adapted by other states. If not, if will not be adapted by other states.
In this way, I don't think it's a good idea to compare what works in one state with the entire United States. If, for example, the U.S. Constitution were changed as progressives want to do, and healthcare were made universal, or education was publicly run by the government (kind of like it is now), chaos will ensue. It will ensue because some states may not have a history or values that accept that.
As you can see, with abortion, when the Federal government forces something on all the people, even if it's for their own good, chaos ensues. Hence, we have the partisan divide.
It is for this reason that I think a New World Order would never work. There is no way that on governing body can decide what is best for the rest of the world, because each country, each que state, has uniqe values and a unique history and culture.
What works for Spain will not necessarily work for, say, Texas. What works in Britain or Canada will not necessarily work for the United States. What works in Britain might work in Texas, but not the U.S. as a whole.
I word it this way because some countries, like Britain and Canada, are the size of a state. Universal Healthcare might work great in a country like Canada with it's 24 million people. Yet try the same system in the U.S. which has 300 million plus citizens and 50 unique little countries that we call states, and chaos will ensue.
Now a facesious example. Say 80% of the people in Britain believe kids shouldn't be spanked. Now say in Michigan 20% say kids should not be spanked. So if this NWO decided to force a ban on spanking kids on the entire world, the people of Michigan would refuse to follow this law. I know I would. I know other people where I live would refuse too, as we are a relatively Christian and conservative region.
There is no way I would allow someone in Copenhagan to tell me they know more about raising kids than I do. I'm not saying I'm an expert, yet it's this freedom of choice in how to discipline my kids that makes mem happy. It's called freedom. It's called soveirinity.
There is not way you can tell me that a world order would do a better job of protecting my freedoms than my own Constitution already does. It is for this reason both Bill Clinton (a liberal) and Georgy Bush (a republican) refused to sign up for the world court. Both didn't want a world court to supercede the U.S. Constitution, which better protects our freedoms than the world court would.
I know that this New World Order would work the way I say above because the people who want this to happen are progressives. And progressives believe experts -- progressives experts preferably -- should decide what is good for everyone.
Besides, if a corporation over spends and crashes, it can file for bankruptcy. If a state mismanages itself, the country can bail it out. If a country crashes, the U.N. can bail it out. Yet what then happens if the NWO spends itself into failure. Rome would happen. A dark age would ensue. Chaos would be the result.
Friday, February 18, 2011
Chaos
The goal of progressives and radical Islam, according to the chaos theory, is to cause chaos by convincing the youth to protest. And even while it's only 1% of the population protesting, the goal is to make you think everyone thinks there's something wrong.
The ultimate goal: collapse of the West, and build up of the New World Order.
For those who want to disregard this theory, consider the following:
12. Obama adds $5 trillion to debt in 2 years (from Washington to Obama the total debt accumulated was only $10 trillion)
14. Kentucky is next
15. Tennessee is next
16. Chaos at the U.S. Mexican border
18. Revolt in Lybia
19. Morocco
20. Bahrainia
21. China
22. Video of Communists imported to march in Wisconsin (here's another one)
I'm not sure I necessarily believe in the chaos theory, yet I think there's enough evidence that we should at least not simply blow it off. When freedom and lives are at stake, all options should always be on the table.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
We must keep our eyes open
About a year ago a doctor said to me, "If I had known the direction that Obama was going to take us, I never would have voted for him."
I didn't say anything to that. I couldn't because I knew what direction Obama was going to take us because I watched the news and paid attention to the things Obama said before he was in campaign mode. I also paid attention to the people he associated with.
I couldn't say anything without risking offending that doctor.
I think there is no excuse to get to a point in your life where you have to say, "What in the world just happened? How did we get here? If we as humans, as Americans, continue to act in this fashion, to just go on with our lives without paying attention, one day our America will be gone.
If we continue to take it for granted, some day it won't be here. If we don't pay attention, close attention, to what's going on around us -- that so many want to destroy America, some day it will be gone. And you'll have those amongst us saying, "So, how did it get from so good to so bad so fast?"
The same thing happened before WWII. Neville Chamberlain warned us about what Hitler was up to, and yet we refused to believe him. Britains refused to listen to such "conspiracy" theories. Millions of people were killed as a result. America refused to listen, and instead it continued to sleep and was not ready when Pearl Harbor was attacked.
There are many people in this world who have a mission to destroy nation states and create either a New World Order or a Caliphate. They want to take away our natural rights and make us live under their laws. If you want to live under that kind of a world, then you should make that choice. That's fine.
Yet you should never all of a sudden realize your United States of America is no more, or we should never get to the point we are in WWIII fighting for our lives against radical Islam that has taken over the Middle East and destroyed Israel, and then say, "Huh? How did this happen?"
We need to keep our eyes open. If we don't, there are those who wish to kill us. There are those who wish to take our freedom away.
Glenn Beck today made an excellent point. He showed a member of the U.N. saying something like, "The Muslim brotherhood is a peaceful organization. They don't have an agenda. If a democracy is formed and they are a political force, they will only get 10% of the country anyway. They are peaceful and we shouldn't be worried about them."
Then he showed the 9th most prominent Muslim in the world and leader of the Muslim Brother hood saying something like, "If we get control of Egypt we will form a caliphate with all of Islam, destroy Israel, kill all the Jews, and then give the rest of the world an ultimatum: either conform and join the caliphate, or die."
So if we listen to the UN minister and the Muslim leader is lying, we are fine. Yet if we listen to the UN minister and the Muslim leaders are telling the truth, we are dead; our freedom is dead; we are dead; WWIII will be started.
Hopefully Glenn Beck is wrong, and he's the first one to say that. He repeatedly says on his show he does not want to be right. Yet at the same time he doesn't want the media, teachers, educators, historians and all the other brilliant people in the U.S. to continue to ignore His theory.
All Beck wants is for people to keep their eyes wide open. He doesn't want people to simply ignore His Caliphate Theory just because it comes from someone who doesn't want to see the decline of the U.S. He doesn't want people to think the U.S. is invincible. He doesn't want us to continue to worship our stuff, and forget that freedom is fragile. He doesn't want us to take our freedom for granted.
Yet you still have people who write things like Ryan Witt did over at the Political Buzz Examiner: " Today featured another class Glenn Beck rant, as he became unhinged at the thought that some people still do not agree with his caliphate conspiracy theory on Egypt."
That guy obviously has his eyes shut as to what Beck is saying. This is a perfect example of the truth that you shouldn't criticize someone and not take what he says in full contects. You shouldn't criticize a show by watching a 2 minute clip.
Beck never once said, "I AM RIGHT!!!" In fact, what he has said is, "I hope I am wrong. I don't think I am, yet I HOPE I am. For the sake of our country, for the sake of our freedom, I hope I am wrong!"
Beck never said he is angry when people don't agree with him. What he said was he is angry when people CHOOSE not to look at all potential angles, especially when you have thugs who wish to control the nations that surround Israel who have every intent of destroying Israel, killing all the Jews, and then killing all the non-Muslims.
If Beck is right, and the media is wrong, and Muslims are telling the truth, then we are DEAD!!!! It's that simple. So whether his theory is right or wrong, we owe it to ourselves to keep our eyes wide open.
I didn't say anything to that. I couldn't because I knew what direction Obama was going to take us because I watched the news and paid attention to the things Obama said before he was in campaign mode. I also paid attention to the people he associated with.
I couldn't say anything without risking offending that doctor.
I think there is no excuse to get to a point in your life where you have to say, "What in the world just happened? How did we get here? If we as humans, as Americans, continue to act in this fashion, to just go on with our lives without paying attention, one day our America will be gone.
If we continue to take it for granted, some day it won't be here. If we don't pay attention, close attention, to what's going on around us -- that so many want to destroy America, some day it will be gone. And you'll have those amongst us saying, "So, how did it get from so good to so bad so fast?"
The same thing happened before WWII. Neville Chamberlain warned us about what Hitler was up to, and yet we refused to believe him. Britains refused to listen to such "conspiracy" theories. Millions of people were killed as a result. America refused to listen, and instead it continued to sleep and was not ready when Pearl Harbor was attacked.
There are many people in this world who have a mission to destroy nation states and create either a New World Order or a Caliphate. They want to take away our natural rights and make us live under their laws. If you want to live under that kind of a world, then you should make that choice. That's fine.
Yet you should never all of a sudden realize your United States of America is no more, or we should never get to the point we are in WWIII fighting for our lives against radical Islam that has taken over the Middle East and destroyed Israel, and then say, "Huh? How did this happen?"
We need to keep our eyes open. If we don't, there are those who wish to kill us. There are those who wish to take our freedom away.
Glenn Beck today made an excellent point. He showed a member of the U.N. saying something like, "The Muslim brotherhood is a peaceful organization. They don't have an agenda. If a democracy is formed and they are a political force, they will only get 10% of the country anyway. They are peaceful and we shouldn't be worried about them."
Then he showed the 9th most prominent Muslim in the world and leader of the Muslim Brother hood saying something like, "If we get control of Egypt we will form a caliphate with all of Islam, destroy Israel, kill all the Jews, and then give the rest of the world an ultimatum: either conform and join the caliphate, or die."
So if we listen to the UN minister and the Muslim leader is lying, we are fine. Yet if we listen to the UN minister and the Muslim leaders are telling the truth, we are dead; our freedom is dead; we are dead; WWIII will be started.
Hopefully Glenn Beck is wrong, and he's the first one to say that. He repeatedly says on his show he does not want to be right. Yet at the same time he doesn't want the media, teachers, educators, historians and all the other brilliant people in the U.S. to continue to ignore His theory.
All Beck wants is for people to keep their eyes wide open. He doesn't want people to simply ignore His Caliphate Theory just because it comes from someone who doesn't want to see the decline of the U.S. He doesn't want people to think the U.S. is invincible. He doesn't want us to continue to worship our stuff, and forget that freedom is fragile. He doesn't want us to take our freedom for granted.
Yet you still have people who write things like Ryan Witt did over at the Political Buzz Examiner: " Today featured another class Glenn Beck rant, as he became unhinged at the thought that some people still do not agree with his caliphate conspiracy theory on Egypt."
That guy obviously has his eyes shut as to what Beck is saying. This is a perfect example of the truth that you shouldn't criticize someone and not take what he says in full contects. You shouldn't criticize a show by watching a 2 minute clip.
Beck never once said, "I AM RIGHT!!!" In fact, what he has said is, "I hope I am wrong. I don't think I am, yet I HOPE I am. For the sake of our country, for the sake of our freedom, I hope I am wrong!"
Beck never said he is angry when people don't agree with him. What he said was he is angry when people CHOOSE not to look at all potential angles, especially when you have thugs who wish to control the nations that surround Israel who have every intent of destroying Israel, killing all the Jews, and then killing all the non-Muslims.
If Beck is right, and the media is wrong, and Muslims are telling the truth, then we are DEAD!!!! It's that simple. So whether his theory is right or wrong, we owe it to ourselves to keep our eyes wide open.
Monday, February 7, 2011
Creating a New World Order: Part VI
Once again the people have caught on to the shenanigans of progressives. You can see this by the T-Party movement, by dropping Obama ratings, and by the latest Gallup poll which shows the the republican party might win 100 seats in the House, and have their biggest gains since 1895.
People -- God fearing capitalists -- know that redistribution of wealth does not work. That america will fail if we keep up this course.
Yet Obama will continue on trying to get his New World Order. He will continue to appologize for the U.S. He will continue to create programs and get them passed through Congress.
So now Hillary Clinton has proposed sending $50 billion to help Africans by purchasing environmentally friendly stoves with money we had to borrow. More debt. More instability.
so once we default on these loans, the value of the dollar will further drop. We will have to print more money to pay off the debt, and the value of the dollar with drop even more.
Of course you will also see that in Keynesian economics one of the recommendations to increase the economy is to increase the money supply -- which will increase inflation. They know this will happen. Yet they say that stagflation that occured in the 1970s was not anticipated.
They knew it. It was part of the plan. Progressives are closer than ever to their NWO. Congressmen are now able -- see 17th Amendment -- to make laws that are unconstitutional. The 10th amendment allows for states to decide on anything now mentioned in the Constitution.
Yet Congress, or the Judiciary, has ruled on Abortion, health care, education, etc. None of those things are mentioned in the Constitution, so the Fed has no right to rule on them. Yet progressives ignore that fact.
So, once the economy collapses, we will have two choices:
We would have to follow U.N. laws, which would mean our Constitution would be trumped. Thus, we would have the New World Order.
The Constitution would be irrelevent. Progressives will be able to perfect the world. They will decrease our choices, force us to make right choices for our own good, perfect society and -- POOF -- the war on capitalism (GOD) would be over.
For a related article, check out this post from the Blaze.
People -- God fearing capitalists -- know that redistribution of wealth does not work. That america will fail if we keep up this course.
Yet Obama will continue on trying to get his New World Order. He will continue to appologize for the U.S. He will continue to create programs and get them passed through Congress.
So now Hillary Clinton has proposed sending $50 billion to help Africans by purchasing environmentally friendly stoves with money we had to borrow. More debt. More instability.
so once we default on these loans, the value of the dollar will further drop. We will have to print more money to pay off the debt, and the value of the dollar with drop even more.
Of course you will also see that in Keynesian economics one of the recommendations to increase the economy is to increase the money supply -- which will increase inflation. They know this will happen. Yet they say that stagflation that occured in the 1970s was not anticipated.
They knew it. It was part of the plan. Progressives are closer than ever to their NWO. Congressmen are now able -- see 17th Amendment -- to make laws that are unconstitutional. The 10th amendment allows for states to decide on anything now mentioned in the Constitution.
Yet Congress, or the Judiciary, has ruled on Abortion, health care, education, etc. None of those things are mentioned in the Constitution, so the Fed has no right to rule on them. Yet progressives ignore that fact.
So, once the economy collapses, we will have two choices:
- cut back on defense
- default on our loans
We would have to follow U.N. laws, which would mean our Constitution would be trumped. Thus, we would have the New World Order.
The Constitution would be irrelevent. Progressives will be able to perfect the world. They will decrease our choices, force us to make right choices for our own good, perfect society and -- POOF -- the war on capitalism (GOD) would be over.
For a related article, check out this post from the Blaze.
Saturday, November 6, 2010
U.S. scolded for human rights violations
According to many experts in the world, including right here in the U.S., America is in violation of the Human Rights Code. The mission of these people is to remedy this problem by forcing the U.S. to comply. That was the topic of a UN Human Rights Council yesterday where the U.S. took a major scolding.
Thank God we have a U.S. Constitution, whereby the natural freedoms of U.S. citizens are protected, and which makes U.S. citizens subject to U.S. Courts and not world courts, otherwise laws created by the Human Rights Council would be forced on U.S. citizens.
Many people in the world, including Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and many European Nations believe the U.S. should be subject to the Human Rights Code, and should follow whatever laws and regulations are passed by the UN. Yet the U.S. has traditionally rejected the Human Rights Code, and instead allows it's citizens to establish its own laws which, in essence, protect our rights.
For instance, the U.S. has a right to blockade Cuba as an incentive to that country to end its tyranny over its own people. Yet since the UN thinks it's okay what's going on in the Cuba, it allowed Cuba to scold the U.S. regarding this issue, and even called it, "Genocide."
Iran said, "“halt serious violations of human rights and humanitarian law including covert external operations by the CIA carried out on pretext of combating terrorism.”
So we can't fight terrorism is the Human Rights Council had its way.
According to Slate, "U.S. Gets Scolding from Human Rights Council," Iran is set to stone a woman for adultery, yet is allowed to scold the U.S. for human rights crimes against women.
Cuba also said we are in violations against immigrants because we don't give them the same rights as other Americans, including the right to food and health care.
Slate also noted that "North Korea, a dictatorial nation known to starve its own people, told the U.S. 'to address inequalities in housing, employment and education' and 'prohibit brutality…by law enforcement officials.' The delegation also noted that it was 'concerned by systematic widespread violations committed by the United States at home and abroad.'"
The British and France scolded us for allowing capital punishment. So we can't punish those who brutally torture fellow Americans?
Look, the purpose of our Constitution is to protect us from each other, not to protect us from ourselves. Socialists around the world (including progressives and liberals in the U.S., as well as socialists and communists around the world) believe a Constitution should likewise protect us from ourselves.
That is why we should be subject to the Human Rights Code. That's why they have tried to make laws than ban parents from spanking their kids, or to prevent restaurants from putting salt in food, or ban alcohol, drugs (they succeeded here), and etc.
According to these socialists we are not smart enough to decide on our own what we should be allowed to do and how to punish those who commit crimes against humanity, so a few experts on a panel in Geneva should be allowed to set the code for everyone on the world to follow.
In essence, the ultimate goal of socialists is to create a New World Order that rules over all the world. Individual freedom thus would be gone. People would no longer be held accountable for their own actions, because individual rights would be squashed. Thus, according to the NWO code, all rights are not natural but created by the Constitution or a government contract.
Thus is how they justify the scolding.
The Blaze notes that former U.S. Ambassador John Bolton advised against joining the Human Rights Council, yet Obama didn't listen and joined because, in my humble opinion, Obama wants the U.S. to be subject to the NWO.
Bolton called Obama naive for allowing the U.S. to be subject to such a scolding, yet I don't think Obama is naive at all. I think this was intentional, mainly because I believe Obama, again, wants the U.S. to join the NWO.
The U.S. is not perfect. We have made mistakes. The neat thing about America is that we come together and fix our nation. Regardless, the U.S. the the most fair and most just nation in the history of the planet, and has provided more people with justice and freedom than many nations in the history of the world combined.
Likewise, the U.S. has done more to advance human rights around the world than many nations in the history of the world combined. Whenever there is a disaster, America is the first to respond. Where there is real genocide, America is right there to stop it (because Lord knows the UN won't).
Yes we can always get better, yet we must not subject ourselves from scoldings from other nations, particularly those nations that mistreat it's own citizens like Iran and Cuba.
The truth is, the UN is a joke. I do not think the U.S. should pull out of the UN, yet we must not submit ourselves to scoldings like this. We must not allow the U.S. to belittled. We must not allow credence to such folly.
Thank God we have a U.S. Constitution, whereby the natural freedoms of U.S. citizens are protected, and which makes U.S. citizens subject to U.S. Courts and not world courts, otherwise laws created by the Human Rights Council would be forced on U.S. citizens.
Many people in the world, including Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and many European Nations believe the U.S. should be subject to the Human Rights Code, and should follow whatever laws and regulations are passed by the UN. Yet the U.S. has traditionally rejected the Human Rights Code, and instead allows it's citizens to establish its own laws which, in essence, protect our rights.
For instance, the U.S. has a right to blockade Cuba as an incentive to that country to end its tyranny over its own people. Yet since the UN thinks it's okay what's going on in the Cuba, it allowed Cuba to scold the U.S. regarding this issue, and even called it, "Genocide."
Iran said, "“halt serious violations of human rights and humanitarian law including covert external operations by the CIA carried out on pretext of combating terrorism.”
So we can't fight terrorism is the Human Rights Council had its way.
According to Slate, "U.S. Gets Scolding from Human Rights Council," Iran is set to stone a woman for adultery, yet is allowed to scold the U.S. for human rights crimes against women.
Cuba also said we are in violations against immigrants because we don't give them the same rights as other Americans, including the right to food and health care.
Slate also noted that "North Korea, a dictatorial nation known to starve its own people, told the U.S. 'to address inequalities in housing, employment and education' and 'prohibit brutality…by law enforcement officials.' The delegation also noted that it was 'concerned by systematic widespread violations committed by the United States at home and abroad.'"
The British and France scolded us for allowing capital punishment. So we can't punish those who brutally torture fellow Americans?
Look, the purpose of our Constitution is to protect us from each other, not to protect us from ourselves. Socialists around the world (including progressives and liberals in the U.S., as well as socialists and communists around the world) believe a Constitution should likewise protect us from ourselves.
That is why we should be subject to the Human Rights Code. That's why they have tried to make laws than ban parents from spanking their kids, or to prevent restaurants from putting salt in food, or ban alcohol, drugs (they succeeded here), and etc.
According to these socialists we are not smart enough to decide on our own what we should be allowed to do and how to punish those who commit crimes against humanity, so a few experts on a panel in Geneva should be allowed to set the code for everyone on the world to follow.
In essence, the ultimate goal of socialists is to create a New World Order that rules over all the world. Individual freedom thus would be gone. People would no longer be held accountable for their own actions, because individual rights would be squashed. Thus, according to the NWO code, all rights are not natural but created by the Constitution or a government contract.
Thus is how they justify the scolding.
The Blaze notes that former U.S. Ambassador John Bolton advised against joining the Human Rights Council, yet Obama didn't listen and joined because, in my humble opinion, Obama wants the U.S. to be subject to the NWO.
Bolton called Obama naive for allowing the U.S. to be subject to such a scolding, yet I don't think Obama is naive at all. I think this was intentional, mainly because I believe Obama, again, wants the U.S. to join the NWO.
The U.S. is not perfect. We have made mistakes. The neat thing about America is that we come together and fix our nation. Regardless, the U.S. the the most fair and most just nation in the history of the planet, and has provided more people with justice and freedom than many nations in the history of the world combined.
Likewise, the U.S. has done more to advance human rights around the world than many nations in the history of the world combined. Whenever there is a disaster, America is the first to respond. Where there is real genocide, America is right there to stop it (because Lord knows the UN won't).
Yes we can always get better, yet we must not subject ourselves from scoldings from other nations, particularly those nations that mistreat it's own citizens like Iran and Cuba.
The truth is, the UN is a joke. I do not think the U.S. should pull out of the UN, yet we must not submit ourselves to scoldings like this. We must not allow the U.S. to belittled. We must not allow credence to such folly.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Is Obama stupid, or is he brilliant???
Something that has been bothering me lately, and many Americans for that matter, is why Obama would take the economic path he has chosen for America, when doing what he is doing has been proven over and over again not to work.
You have Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush all entering the office of the President, all of then lowered taxes, cut back on federal regulation, and watched as their respective economies skyrocket ted.
All presidents who did the opposite watched over lumbering, staggering or falling economies. Warren G. Harding's progressive policies created a progressive tax system that ultimately lead to a 73% tax margin, and the economy sputtered. Harding and Coolidge saved the day, and the result was the roaring 20s.
John F. Kennedy came into office in 1960 and received a sputtering economy, and he cut taxes. The result was profits to the government nearly doubled. The same thing happened to Coolidge, Reagan, Kennedy and Bush.
In fact, during all these recoveries the middle class got closer and closer to the upper class and the rich. Those under poverty made more and more money. Jobs grew at record levels.
So, given all this success, all this evidence, why then would Barack Obama intentionally do the opposite? Think for a minute. Why would this be?
The answer is idealism. Obama and those who follow him, like Oprah Winfrey, are progressivists who have an ideal view of the world. They think that sacrifices made today will result in a perfect world in the future. And, therefore, he has taken up this opportunity, while the cards are down, to convince people that taxing, spending, and bailing out banks will save the economy. Yet, that is not his goal at all. While he tells us what he thinks we want to hear, his intention is altogether separate from anything Americans would ever want.
You see, Obama is a progressive. His goal is to create an ideal world. He believes that all this prosperity created by traditional American values, by a booming economy, is the antithesis to his goal of perfection.
One thing that progressives do not know, cannot conceive of, is that perfection is not possible. There never will be world peace because there will always be evil people. There never will be a world where there are no poor because some people don't have the values it takes to succeed. That's just the way it is. I'm not being insensitive, that's just a fact.
Yet, conservatism, the antithesis of liberal progressive policies, create a world that is as close to that ideal world that progressives yearn for. Yet they hate that some people make more than others. That's not fair. In there world, so long as there is any degree of inequality, there will never be an ideal world -- euphoria.
And, therefore, they intend to ignore the principles of this nation, tax, spend, redistribute wealth, create more unemployment benefits we cannot afford. regulate businesses, create cap and trade policies, and these sorts of programs at the expense of real progress, and with the goal of euphoria.
So, while thinkers like you and me might be thinking: is Obama stupid. The truth is, he has a goal, a purpose, for going against what has worked in the past. Because, what we think works, he sees -- they see -- as going in the wrong direction.
Obama's goal is to create a New World Order where there is no crime, where there is no global warming, where all animals live in peace with man, and where there are no values to hold people back from doing things they want.
No. Obama is not stupid if you know what his true intentions are. He is brilliant.
You have Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush all entering the office of the President, all of then lowered taxes, cut back on federal regulation, and watched as their respective economies skyrocket ted.
All presidents who did the opposite watched over lumbering, staggering or falling economies. Warren G. Harding's progressive policies created a progressive tax system that ultimately lead to a 73% tax margin, and the economy sputtered. Harding and Coolidge saved the day, and the result was the roaring 20s.
John F. Kennedy came into office in 1960 and received a sputtering economy, and he cut taxes. The result was profits to the government nearly doubled. The same thing happened to Coolidge, Reagan, Kennedy and Bush.
In fact, during all these recoveries the middle class got closer and closer to the upper class and the rich. Those under poverty made more and more money. Jobs grew at record levels.
So, given all this success, all this evidence, why then would Barack Obama intentionally do the opposite? Think for a minute. Why would this be?
The answer is idealism. Obama and those who follow him, like Oprah Winfrey, are progressivists who have an ideal view of the world. They think that sacrifices made today will result in a perfect world in the future. And, therefore, he has taken up this opportunity, while the cards are down, to convince people that taxing, spending, and bailing out banks will save the economy. Yet, that is not his goal at all. While he tells us what he thinks we want to hear, his intention is altogether separate from anything Americans would ever want.
You see, Obama is a progressive. His goal is to create an ideal world. He believes that all this prosperity created by traditional American values, by a booming economy, is the antithesis to his goal of perfection.
One thing that progressives do not know, cannot conceive of, is that perfection is not possible. There never will be world peace because there will always be evil people. There never will be a world where there are no poor because some people don't have the values it takes to succeed. That's just the way it is. I'm not being insensitive, that's just a fact.
Yet, conservatism, the antithesis of liberal progressive policies, create a world that is as close to that ideal world that progressives yearn for. Yet they hate that some people make more than others. That's not fair. In there world, so long as there is any degree of inequality, there will never be an ideal world -- euphoria.
And, therefore, they intend to ignore the principles of this nation, tax, spend, redistribute wealth, create more unemployment benefits we cannot afford. regulate businesses, create cap and trade policies, and these sorts of programs at the expense of real progress, and with the goal of euphoria.
So, while thinkers like you and me might be thinking: is Obama stupid. The truth is, he has a goal, a purpose, for going against what has worked in the past. Because, what we think works, he sees -- they see -- as going in the wrong direction.
Obama's goal is to create a New World Order where there is no crime, where there is no global warming, where all animals live in peace with man, and where there are no values to hold people back from doing things they want.
No. Obama is not stupid if you know what his true intentions are. He is brilliant.
Friday, December 11, 2009
New World Order will mandate what we eat and how many children we have
Reading some of the reports coming out Copenhagen tonight is enough to send a cold shiver up any free thinking person's spine. Not only is the aim to end global warming, but it's to change the way we live and think.
A reporter for the Guardian writes that one of the main ways of controlling climate change and force people to be health is to mandate a diet of less meat. The report notes:
"The first official recommendations for a diet that is both healthy and good for the environment are published today, and they are likely to be seen as an assault on the UK's current food system.
"To fight climate change and tackle the growing crisis of diet-related diseases such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer, British consumers must cut down on meat and dairy produce, reduce their intake of processed foods and curb waste."
Of course such a policy would have devastating consequences not just on our God given right to choose what we eat, but on the economy. One study noted that "cutting processed food and reducing consumption of intensively-produced meat and dairy foods could lead to a shrinking of the UK food and drink industry."
If you consider the food and drink industry is 7% of Britain's GDP, this could be huge. And if it were a worldwide mandate, huge wouldn't even begin to describe it.
One report out of Copenhagen notes a hidden agenda that would take away the sovereign rights of the United States and Create a Global Economy. Then they want to name Obama as the world president. I believe I wrote about how this was a quest of Obama's in this post.
The funny thing is, many democrats (including some I work with) support this. One of my liberal friends said, "It's time another country had a chance to be the leader of the world."
In Copenhagen, China recommending that the entire world adapt it's one child per family policy. A leader of the communist government said, "Dealing with climate change is not simply an issue of CO2 emission reduction but a comprehensive challenge involving political, economic, social, cultural and ecological issues, and the population concern fits right into the picture"
Likewise, the article notes: "Although China's family planning policy has received criticism over the past three decades, Zhao said that China's population program has made a great historic contribution to the well-being of society."
Right there: a shiver went up my spine and it should yours too.
Another report from one of Canada's premier newspapers (click here), reports that China's policy ought to be adapted by the rest of the world too.
The author notes:
A reporter for the Guardian writes that one of the main ways of controlling climate change and force people to be health is to mandate a diet of less meat. The report notes:
"The first official recommendations for a diet that is both healthy and good for the environment are published today, and they are likely to be seen as an assault on the UK's current food system.
"To fight climate change and tackle the growing crisis of diet-related diseases such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer, British consumers must cut down on meat and dairy produce, reduce their intake of processed foods and curb waste."
Of course such a policy would have devastating consequences not just on our God given right to choose what we eat, but on the economy. One study noted that "cutting processed food and reducing consumption of intensively-produced meat and dairy foods could lead to a shrinking of the UK food and drink industry."
If you consider the food and drink industry is 7% of Britain's GDP, this could be huge. And if it were a worldwide mandate, huge wouldn't even begin to describe it.
One report out of Copenhagen notes a hidden agenda that would take away the sovereign rights of the United States and Create a Global Economy. Then they want to name Obama as the world president. I believe I wrote about how this was a quest of Obama's in this post.
The funny thing is, many democrats (including some I work with) support this. One of my liberal friends said, "It's time another country had a chance to be the leader of the world."
In Copenhagen, China recommending that the entire world adapt it's one child per family policy. A leader of the communist government said, "Dealing with climate change is not simply an issue of CO2 emission reduction but a comprehensive challenge involving political, economic, social, cultural and ecological issues, and the population concern fits right into the picture"
Likewise, the article notes: "Although China's family planning policy has received criticism over the past three decades, Zhao said that China's population program has made a great historic contribution to the well-being of society."
Right there: a shiver went up my spine and it should yours too.
Another report from one of Canada's premier newspapers (click here), reports that China's policy ought to be adapted by the rest of the world too.
The author notes:
"A planetary law, such as China's one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.Eerily, she also notes:
"The world's other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity's soaring reproduction rate.
"Ironically, China, despite its dirty coal plants, is the world's leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict."
"Humans are the only rational animals but have yet to prove it. Medical and other scientific advances have benefited by delivering lower infant mortality rates as well as longevity. Both are welcome, but humankind has not yet re calibrated its behavior to account for the fact that the world can only accommodate so many people, especially if billions get indoor plumbing and cars.
"The fix is simple. It's dramatic. And yet the world's leaders don't even have this on their agenda in Copenhagen.
So basically she believes man is destroying the earth, and the only solution is to not allow men to be born. Basically, she believes this poppycock theory, and wants the "New World Order" to force it on the rest of us.
This is the kind of stuff that scares the bejeezers out of me, and it should you too.
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
The rest of the world does not get a vote
A new poll by the BBC shows that while Obama has been unable to muster a significant lead over his republican rival John McCain, the world would prefer Obama as the U.S. president.
The article, "World wants Obama as president: poll," notes that 17 of 22 nations polled thought world relations would improve with an Obama presidency.
My thought on this: who cares what the rest of the world thinks. They don't get a vote. Not only that, who cares what the rest of the world thinks, because they do not have the best interests of the U.S. on their minds.
Sometimes, unfortunately, a president has to do things that might not be popular. He or she has to do what he or she thinks is right. He cannot make decisions because "Oh, this might offend France, or Spain, or Mexico."
Sure, he should have empathy for other nations and people around the world, but that should not be at the forefront of his mind. On the forefront of his mind should be: AMERICA.
Personally, I think Obama would think of other nations before the U.S. I think he would put what the UN thinks before what is best for the U.S. I think he would support a world court that would have jurisdiction over our courts, thus taking away some of our Constitutional rights.
Obama would also allow the UN Security Council decide where we go to war and where we send our soldiers. I think this would be bad policy. I think this would be foolish.
And that's just another reason why I support John McCain for President: he puts his country first.
And that is my thought of the day.
The article, "World wants Obama as president: poll," notes that 17 of 22 nations polled thought world relations would improve with an Obama presidency.
My thought on this: who cares what the rest of the world thinks. They don't get a vote. Not only that, who cares what the rest of the world thinks, because they do not have the best interests of the U.S. on their minds.
Sometimes, unfortunately, a president has to do things that might not be popular. He or she has to do what he or she thinks is right. He cannot make decisions because "Oh, this might offend France, or Spain, or Mexico."
Sure, he should have empathy for other nations and people around the world, but that should not be at the forefront of his mind. On the forefront of his mind should be: AMERICA.
Personally, I think Obama would think of other nations before the U.S. I think he would put what the UN thinks before what is best for the U.S. I think he would support a world court that would have jurisdiction over our courts, thus taking away some of our Constitutional rights.
Obama would also allow the UN Security Council decide where we go to war and where we send our soldiers. I think this would be bad policy. I think this would be foolish.
And that's just another reason why I support John McCain for President: he puts his country first.
And that is my thought of the day.
Thursday, July 24, 2008
It's obvious: Media, Europe in love with Obama
What's funny to me is this newspaper article I read today said that Obama's speech today in Germany was one of the most anticipated in U.S. History.
Is not this type of coverage a bit over the top? They -- the media -- seem to treat Obama like he is the second coming of Christ.
The media noted that flags were cut out of cardboard so the crowd had something to wave at Obama.
Of course, it would make sense that opinion of Obama in Germany, and the rest of the world as well -- including the radical Muslims -- would be high on Obama, considering his plans to calm down the Arrogant America. He has a vision of the New World Order.
Two-hundred thousand Europeans showed up to listen to Obama because they think he supports them in their view that America is to blame for much of what ails the world today.
Obama wants to decrease the military, decrease our military mite around the world, which would bode well for radical nations around the world who don't want America "bullying" them around, and other nations who don't want to see America "bullying" the rest of the world.
With a diminished American military, one with no defense weapons in space (which Obama pledges to stop), we won't be able to defend ourselves against a nuclear attack, making America more vulnerable.
However blind they are that a more vulnerable America makes it far easier for Iran and North Korea to get its way. Maybe even provides an opportunity for them to build up their nuclear programs (without the United States knowing about it.)
Obama wants to raise our taxes, both in the name of government programs intended to "help" the poor, but also in the name of global warming or climate change. Obama actually thinks he's doing something good by all of this, but other nations are eager to watch as all this government results in a sputtering American economy, which brings the "arrogant" America more on par with the rest of the world.
This is not necessarily my opinion, but the opinion I think a good portion of the rest of the world has toward America, and Obama. Not all of the rest of the world, but at least enough to garnish excitement about attending an Obama speech with as much "anticipation" as the Germans did for this speech.
And I don't know if the media is trying to pull one over on the American voter here, but I do know this: A large number of American voters know what the media is up to, as evidenced by a new Fox News Poll showing Obama has lost 2 points to McCain in the past week, and is now only up by 1 point.
They know that the American media will do whatever it takes to muster up sales, and right now Obama is good for sales far more than McCain, as evidenced by the one reporter available when McCain got off a plane the other day.
You'd think they'd pretend to be non-bias for one day and have at least 2 reporters on McCain. Or at least one magazine cover with McCain on it. When I went to the library the other day, Obama was on the cover of six magazines, McCain zero.
So, while McCain trudges forward, the media has turned a blind eye to him and is drumming up enthusiasm toward Obama, particularly now that the rest of the world is all hyped up about him. But an intelligent America is not buying into the hype, as polls show.
The neatest thing of all about the "anticipation" and "love" of the rest of the world for Barack Hussein Obama is: They don't get a vote.
Is not this type of coverage a bit over the top? They -- the media -- seem to treat Obama like he is the second coming of Christ.
The media noted that flags were cut out of cardboard so the crowd had something to wave at Obama.
Of course, it would make sense that opinion of Obama in Germany, and the rest of the world as well -- including the radical Muslims -- would be high on Obama, considering his plans to calm down the Arrogant America. He has a vision of the New World Order.
Two-hundred thousand Europeans showed up to listen to Obama because they think he supports them in their view that America is to blame for much of what ails the world today.
Obama wants to decrease the military, decrease our military mite around the world, which would bode well for radical nations around the world who don't want America "bullying" them around, and other nations who don't want to see America "bullying" the rest of the world.
With a diminished American military, one with no defense weapons in space (which Obama pledges to stop), we won't be able to defend ourselves against a nuclear attack, making America more vulnerable.
However blind they are that a more vulnerable America makes it far easier for Iran and North Korea to get its way. Maybe even provides an opportunity for them to build up their nuclear programs (without the United States knowing about it.)
Obama wants to raise our taxes, both in the name of government programs intended to "help" the poor, but also in the name of global warming or climate change. Obama actually thinks he's doing something good by all of this, but other nations are eager to watch as all this government results in a sputtering American economy, which brings the "arrogant" America more on par with the rest of the world.
This is not necessarily my opinion, but the opinion I think a good portion of the rest of the world has toward America, and Obama. Not all of the rest of the world, but at least enough to garnish excitement about attending an Obama speech with as much "anticipation" as the Germans did for this speech.
And I don't know if the media is trying to pull one over on the American voter here, but I do know this: A large number of American voters know what the media is up to, as evidenced by a new Fox News Poll showing Obama has lost 2 points to McCain in the past week, and is now only up by 1 point.
They know that the American media will do whatever it takes to muster up sales, and right now Obama is good for sales far more than McCain, as evidenced by the one reporter available when McCain got off a plane the other day.
You'd think they'd pretend to be non-bias for one day and have at least 2 reporters on McCain. Or at least one magazine cover with McCain on it. When I went to the library the other day, Obama was on the cover of six magazines, McCain zero.
So, while McCain trudges forward, the media has turned a blind eye to him and is drumming up enthusiasm toward Obama, particularly now that the rest of the world is all hyped up about him. But an intelligent America is not buying into the hype, as polls show.
The neatest thing of all about the "anticipation" and "love" of the rest of the world for Barack Hussein Obama is: They don't get a vote.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)